Drawing for KAYTI-JO

USPTO serial 78557315

KAYTI-JO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KAYTI-JO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Toys, namely, dolls, doll accessories, doll clothing and shoes, doll costumes, doll furniture, doll houses, doll house furniture, doll play sets and doll cases; stuffed toys; toy action figures and accessories therefor; toy jewelry, watches and clocks; modeled plastic toy figurines; toy artificial fingernails; children's play cosmetics; cases for play accessories; board games, card games, party games, electronic educational games for children; puzzles; play tents; party favors in the nature of small toys, party games; play dinnerware and flatwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 30, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 30, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 26, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 20, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 20, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 19, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 19, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 18, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 8, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance