USPTO serial 78557361
FRAPPE OLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FRAPPE OLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bridgeville, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry I. Friedman, Esq.
BARRY I FRIEDMAN ESQ METZ LEWIS LLC11 STANWIX ST STE 18PITTSBURGH, PA 15222-1312UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | READY TO DRINK MILK-BASED BEVERAGES CONTAINING COFFEE | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | READY TO DRINK COFFEE BEVERAGES; READY TO DRINK TEA-BASED BEVERAGES; CHOCOLATES; COCOA; CHOCOLATE COVERED COFFEE BEANS; ICE CREAM; FLAVORING SYRUP; BREAKFAST CEREALS; BULK AND PACKAGED COFFEE; BISCOTTI | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | BOTTLED WATER FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | DISTRIBUTION OF PREPACKAGED FOOD THROUGH WHOLESALE SERVICES; WHOLESALE ORDERING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF PREPACKAGED FOOD; WHOLESALE STORES FEATURING PREPACKAGED FOOD; RETAIL SHOPS FEATURING PREPACKAGED FOOD | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | DISTRIBUTION SERVICES OF MADE TO ORDER AND PREPACKAGED FOOD AND BEVERAGES, NAMELY, DELIVERY OF FOOD, BEVERAGES AND CONDIMENTS THEREFOR TO HOMES AND OFFICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | RESTAURANT AND CARRYOUT RESTAURANT SERVICES FEATURING PREPACKAGED AND MADE TO ORDER FOOD AND BEVERAGES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IP Brands LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named FRAPPE OLE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |