USPTO serial 78557783
BEAUTY RESCULPTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3710558Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 10, 2009
- Examiner
- LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BEAUTY RESCULPTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathryn Jennison Shultz
KATHRYN JENNISON SHULTZ JENNISON & SHULTZ PC2001 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1102ARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tracie Martyn, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Tracie Martyn, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Tracie Martyn, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named BEAUTY RESCULPTING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 10, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2016 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2016 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 14, 2016 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| May 14, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 2, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |