USPTO serial 78558111
NH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey R. Filipek
Ray Thomas, Jr. Wenderoth, Lind & Ponack, L.L.P.1030 15th Street NWSuite 400 EastWashington, DC 20005-1503Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Fertilizers; higher fatty acids for use in food; artificial sweeteners | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | Soaps and synthetic, organic, liquid and water-soluble cleaning agents; dentifrices; cosmetics and non-medicated toiletries; perfumery and fragrances for personal purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Medical reagents used for testing for allergies to foods; powdered milk for babies; isomalt-oligosaccharide and dietary fibre used as a food supplement; mucopolysaccharide and collagen as a food supplement | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Diagnostic apparatus for testing food | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Edible oils and fats; milk products, namely, yogurt, lactic acid drinks, lactic acid bacteria drinks; fresh, chilled or frozen meat for human consumption; eggs; seafood; frozen vegetables; frozen fruits; processed meat products, namely, dried meat, sausages, canned cooked meat, meat boiled down in soy sauce, bottled cooked meat, ham, bacon, beef croquettes, pork croquettes, chicken croquettes; processed seafood; processed vegetables and fruits; fried tofu pieces; freeze-dried tofu pieces; jelly made from devils tongue root or a paste made from the starch of the devils tongue; soybean milk or soy milk; tofu or bean curd; fermented soybeans, namely, natto; processed eggs; stew and soup mixes; instant and pre-cooked stew, soup and miso soup; dried flakes of layer for sprinkling on rice in hot water; fermented soybean; processed peanuts; proteins being foodstuffs for human consumption; edible seaweeds; fruit jellies; processed milk-based foodstuffs in powder, granule, tablet, liquid, paste or capsule containing powdered milk for food purposes, and processed peas | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Starch-based binding agents for ice cream; meat tenderizers for household purposes; preparations for stiffening whipped cream; tea; coffee and cocoa; ice; confectionery, namely, wafers, hardtacks, candies, cookies, crackers, sherbets, cream puffs, sponge cakes, doughnuts, pies, biscuits, frozen yogurt, pancakes, waffles; bread and buns; food seasonings; spices; ice cream mixes; sherbet mixes; cereal preparations, namely, breakfast cereals; almond paste; Chinese stuffed dumplings; sandwiches; Chinese steamed dumplings; sushi; fried balls of batter mix with small pieces of octopus; steamed buns stuffed with minced meat; hamburger sandwiches; pizzas; box lunches consisting primarily of rice, processed meat, poultry, fish and vegetables; hot dog sandwiches; meat pies; ravioli; yeast powder; fermenting malted rice; yeast baking powder; instant cake mixes; sake lees for food; husked rice; processed husked oats and processed husked barley; flour and starch for food, namely, wheat flour, rice flour and corn starch; gluten for food; curry; instant and pre-cooked curry, and seasoned powder for sprinkling on rice; isomalt-oligosaccharide and dietary fibre used as main ingredients for flavoring purposes; mucopolysaccharide and collagen as a main ingredient for flavoring purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Wreaths of natural flowers; live fishing bait; live edible aquatic animals; raw vegetables; fresh fruits; unprocessed grain corn; protein for animal consumption; animal foodstuffs and unroasted coffee; fresh peas and fresh peanuts; raw pulses, namely, raw beans, namely, red beans, kidney beans, broad beans, soybeans; unprocessed peas; and unprocessed peanuts | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Beer; non-alcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated beverages; non-alcoholic fruit juice; extracts of hops for making beer; whey beverages; vegetable juices | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Import and export agencies | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Fur treatment, namely, conditioning, dyeing, glossing, mothproofing; creaser-resistant treatment of cloth and clothing; food processing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Testing, inspection and research of pharmaceuticals, cosmetics or foodstuff testing, inspection of and research of agriculture, livestock breeding or fisheries | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nippon Meat Packers, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Nippon Meat Packers, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NH
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 4, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 2, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 17, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |