USPTO serial 78558949
SUPERNUS PHARMACEUTICALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 13, 2007
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SUPERNUS PHARMACEUTICALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rockville, MD
SUPERNUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
ROCKVILLE, MD
SUPERNUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
ROCKVILLE, MD
SUPERNUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
ROCKVILLE, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory S. Bernabeo
Gregory S. Bernabeo Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP1500 Market Street37th FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | [ Chemicals and excipients used in the manufacture of pharmaceuticals, namely, formulations which promote controlled release, reduced abuse potential, enhanced solubility, enhanced permeability or enhanced absorption of pharmaceutical agents ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 21, 2007 |
| 005 | Pharmaceuticals preparations for the treatment of central nervous system disorders | ACTIVE | Mar 21, 2007 |
| 042 | [ Pharmaceutical drug development; pharmaceutical drug development and research services, namely, drug screening services; pharmaceutical development services for others, namely, evaluating the permeability and absorption of pharmaceuticals in the body and developing formulations to facilitate and improve the delivery of drugs into the body; pharmaceutical research and development services, namely, cell-based in vitro and in vivo screening services ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 12, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Shire Laboratories Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SUPERNUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SUPERNUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SUPERNUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SUPERNUS PHARMACEUTICALS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2017 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 20, 2017 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 16, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 17, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |