Drawing for EXTREME HEALTH INITIATIVE

USPTO serial 78559269

EXTREME HEALTH INITIATIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AIKENS, RONALD E
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXTREME HEALTH INITIATIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kirsten Wegner

KIRSTEN WEGNER PATTON BOGGS2550 M ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, in the nature of classes, lectures and educational programs, through live and online presentations, to increase awareness of preventable diseasesACTIVEMay 23, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2007MAB7ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Dec 19, 2007ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
May 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2007CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 21, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 21, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jul 28, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 28, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 28, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 31, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 8, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 19, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 6, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 2, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 1, 2005CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 31, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 31, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 10, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance