USPTO serial 78559346
HOMES MAGAZINE SANTA BARBARA & SANTA YNEZ VALLEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 18, 2006
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with HOMES MAGAZINE SANTA BARBARA & SANTA YNEZ VALLEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ATASCADERO, CA
Atascadero, CA
Incline Village, NV
Incline Village, NV
Incline Village, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew S. Kennedy
Matthew S. Kennedy MATTHEW S. KENNEDY, APLCPOB 1031SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93406-1031Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Magazine featuring real estate listings for homes | ACTIVE | Jan 12, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RAIKE, FRED MICHAEL, MR.
- Other trademarks owned by Raike, Fred, Michael
- Other trademarks owned by Raike, Julie, A
- Other trademarks owned by Raike, Julie, A
- Other trademarks owned by Raike, Fred, Michael
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named HOMES MAGAZINE SANTA BARBARA & SANTA YNEZ VALLEY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 27, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 27, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 7, 2013 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 1, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| May 8, 2012 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| May 4, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |