USPTO serial 78559352
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY HOMES MAGAZINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 25, 2006
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY HOMES MAGAZINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Incline Village, NV
Incline Village, NV
Incline Village, CA
Atascadero, CA
ATASCADERO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew S. Kennedy
Matthew S. Kennedy MATTHEW S. KENNEDY, APLCPOB 1031SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93406-1031Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Magazines featuring real estate listings of homes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 12, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Raike, Julie, A
- Other trademarks owned by Raike, Julie, A
- Other trademarks owned by Raike, Fred, Michael
- Other trademarks owned by Raike, Fred, Michael
- Other trademarks owned by RAIKE, FRED MICHAEL, MR.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY HOMES MAGAZINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 2, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 9, 2012 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| May 4, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 13, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |