Drawing for JYT HEALTH

USPTO serial 78559358

JYT HEALTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JYT HEALTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carla B. Oakley

Carla B. Oakley Morgan, Lewis and Bockius, LLPOne Market, Spear Street TowerSan Francisco, CA 94105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035dissemination of advertising messages and materials, namely graphics, brochures, and displays, through print and electronic media, relating to healthcare products and services; advisory services related to management of health care businesses and organizationsACTIVE—
044Educational services, namely providing information in the field of healthcare to patients, providers, administrators and other participants in the healthcare industryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 23, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 16, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 16, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 16, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 13, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 13, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 13, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 17, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 17, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 17, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 18, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 6, 2006WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Apr 6, 2006WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 14, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 10, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 8, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 1, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 27, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 31, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 10, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance