USPTO serial 78559627
SIFCO APPLIED SURFACE CONCEPTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3172292Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 14, 2006
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SIFCO APPLIED SURFACE CONCEPTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gerald T. Shekleton
Gerald T. Shekleton Husch Blackwell LLP120 S. Riverside Plaza, 22nd FloorChicago, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical solutions, gels and media for use in surface enhancement, namely electroplating, anodizing, electropolishing, spray deposition, vapor deposition and laser deposition | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2006 |
| 009 | Surface enhancement equipment, namely, machines for electroplating, anodizing, electropolishing, electrically-charged spray deposition, electrically-charged vapor deposition and laser deposition; electric current rectifiers and applicators for applying solutions for use in electrochemical machining and electroplating | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2006 |
| 040 | Custom surface enhancement for others, namely electroplating, anodizing, electropolishing, spray deposition, vapor deposition and laser deposition | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 2004 |
| 041 | Training in the use and operation of equipment, solutions, gels and media for surface enhancement, namely electroplating, anodizing, electropolishing, spray deposition, vapor deposition and laser deposition | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2005 |
| 042 | Custom equipment design for others for use in surface enhancement, namely electroplating, anodizing, electropolishing, spray deposition, vapor deposition and laser deposition | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SIFCO Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SIFCO Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SIFCO Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SIFCO APPLIED SURFACE CONCEPTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 14, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 19, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 19, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 10, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |