USPTO serial 78560112
HIGH PERFORMANCE VISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HIGH PERFORMANCE VISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Smith
JEFFREY A. SMITH MILLEN, WHITE, ZELANO & BRANIGAN, P.C.2200 CLARENDON BLVD STE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201-3360UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Operating a facility providing eye care services, namely, laser eye surgery services. | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |