Drawing for BABIES LOVE US. PARENTS TRUST US.

USPTO serial 78560136

BABIES LOVE US. PARENTS TRUST US.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAYES, GINA CLARK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BABIES LOVE US. PARENTS TRUST US.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mei-lan Stark

Steven Plotkin THE WALT DISNEY COMPANYCorporate Legal- Trademark Department500 South Buena Vista StreetBurbank, CA 91521-0643

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Production and rental of motion picture films; production of television and radio programs; rental of DVDs featuring television and radio programs; presentation of motion picture films, namely in a motion picture film theater; rental of sound and video recordings; production of entertainment, namely games, contests, television shows, video clips, and motion picture film clips for distribution via television, cable, satellite, audio and video media, cartridges, laser discs, computer discs and via the Internet; providing amusement park and theme park services; live stage shows; presentation of live performances, namely comedy and musical performances; theater productions; entertainer services, namely live performances by costumed charactersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 7, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 20, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 31, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 31, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 20, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 26, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 6, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 3, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 27, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 26, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 28, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 10, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance