USPTO serial 78560314
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
EAST AURORA, NY
EAST AURORA, NY
EAST AURORA, NY
Huntington Beach, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George L. Snyder
George L. Snyder Hodgson Russ LLP140 Pearl Street, Suite 100The Guaranty BuildingBuffalo, NY 14202-4040| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use by medical professionals for ensuring proper medication delivery, remote monitoring of the infusion process, facilitating infusion pump programming, and facilitating billing, management, and archival storage of client and clinic information | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Medical apparatus for introducing pharmaceutical preparations into the human body, namely, medical infusion pumps; administration sets consisting primarily of infusion equipment, namely, tubing, luer locks, luer lock caps, bag spikes, Y-sites, check valves, filters, and reservoirs | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 21, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 21, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 22, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 27, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 21, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 7, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 20, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 16, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |