USPTO serial 78560392
IDEAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IDEAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
S. Roxanne Edwards
BAKER & MCKENZIE2001 ROSS AVE STE 2300DALLAS, TX 75201-2968UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Loudspeakers; antennas; eyeglasses; electric luminescent display boards; electronic burglar alarms; headsets for use with telephones, computers and stereos; audio and electrical video receivers; auricular telephone; batteries; computers; cinematographic cameras; tripod for cameras; portable video cameras; CD-ROM and compact disc changers for computers; video game cartridges; blank audio and video cassettes; cellular phones; phones; apparatus for publishing films, namely, color filters for television and motion picture film cameras; magnetic tapes, namely, blank magnetic tapes for tape recorders; blank audio tapes; blank compact discs; computer programs, namely, computer game programs; computer printers; personal computers; keyboards; remote controls for radios, televisions, electronic video games, stereos and video game interactive hand held remote controls for playing electronic games; telephone answering machines; radar detectors; apparatus for slides, namely, slide projectors and slide film mounts; blank digital video discs, blank record discs, computer game discs and video game discs; intercoms; computer games, namely, computer software games and computer game tapes; laptops; optical readers; microphones; modems; monitors of all type, namely, video, television and computer monitors; mouse; screens, namely, LCD screens, flat panel display screens; screens for projection; video screens; video equipment for vehicles, namely, car televisions; radios for vehicles; radios; radar sets, namely, radar detectors; radio transmitters; exposed cinematographic, camera and slide film; audio receivers; DVD and CD reproducers, namely, DVD and CD audio and video recorders; sirens; telephones; televisions; transmitters of sound, namely, radio and television transmitters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |