CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for 1-800-FLA-HURT

USPTO serial 78560798

1-800-FLA-HURT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 1-800-FLA-HURT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter Koziol

RICHARD L HORN AKERMAN SENTERFITT222 LAKEVIEW AVE 4TH FLWEST PALM BEACH, FL 33402-3188UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042LEGAL SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF PERSONAL INJURY, MEDICAL MALPRACTICE, WORKERS COMPENSATION, CRIMINAL DEFENSE, SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY, AND WRONGFUL DEATHACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 12, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 23, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 23, 2006OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Aug 16, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 12, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 22, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 12, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 16, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 9, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 3, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 3, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 3, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 1, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance