USPTO serial 78561157
BWW FUSION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BWW FUSION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donna J. Bunton
DONNA J BUNTON NIXON & VANDERHYE PC11TH FL901 N GLEBE RDARLINGTON, VA 22203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | STAIN REPELLENT CHEMICALS USED IN THE TREATMENT OF FIBERS, YARNS, FABRICS, SYNTHETIC TEXTILES, TEXTILE WEBS OR FINISHED TEXTILES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BI Properties I Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BI Properties I Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named BWW FUSION
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 6, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 17, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 26, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 1, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |