USPTO serial 78561224
INOVIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HIRSCHMAN, PAMELA
- Law office
- PHOTOCOMP COORDINATOR
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INOVIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harold J. Milstein
HAROLD J MILSTEIN HELLER EHRMAN WHITE & MCAULIFFE LLP275 MIDDLEFIELD RDMENLO PARK, CA 94025-3506UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical devices for the ablation of benign or cancerous tumors in the body; medical devices for the coagulation of vascular tissue for the purpose of reducing blood loss during surgical resection; medical devices for repeated access of the circulatory system for the delivery of fluids and/or medicines and the drawing of blood for laboratory examination, all for use in cancer therapy | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2006 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 8, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |