USPTO serial 78561431
M CLUB BY MARQUIS JET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with M CLUB BY MARQUIS JET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John P. Rynkiewicz
JOHN P RYNKIEWICZ KAYE SCHOLER LLP901 15TH ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-2329UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Fractional jet ownership services in the nature of formation, brokerage and management of time share interests in aircraft; providing and processing prepaid cards services for air travel, air and ground transportation; and providing and processing prepaid cards services for concierge services | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Air and vehicle transportation services; jet travel and reservation services; leasing of aircraft | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Concierge services for air and ground transportation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Marquis Jet Partners, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Marquis Jet Partners, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named M CLUB BY MARQUIS JET
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 6, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 10, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 26, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |