Drawing for EPIDRYL

USPTO serial 78561525

EPIDRYL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3325962Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 30, 2007
Examiner
TENG, SIMON
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EPIDRYL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carl J. Spagnuolo

BRIAN KLUGHAUPT KAPLAN2630 NATURES WAYPALM BEACH GARDENS, FL 33410UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Injectable pharmaceuticals for the treatment of life-threatening allergic reactionsSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDJun 12, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2010C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
May 11, 2010CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 30, 2010CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Jan 12, 2010PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 30, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 25, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2007REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 26, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 27, 2007CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Aug 24, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 26, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 19, 2007EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jun 14, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 28, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 28, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 28, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 30, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 24, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 5, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 25, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Nov 25, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 25, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 24, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 24, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 1, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 12, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 14, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 9, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 7, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance