Drawing for THE FIRST IN REMOTE CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 78561702

THE FIRST IN REMOTE CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRASER, RICHARD
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE FIRST IN REMOTE CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin Pfeffer

MARTIN PFEFFER OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN LLP1180 AVE OF THE AMERICAS FL 7NEW YORK, NY 10036-8443UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Remote controls for radio, televisions, stereos, cable television, and satellite televisionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 14, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 12, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 12, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 28, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 21, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 21, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 10, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 25, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 17, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 17, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 30, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance