USPTO serial 78561825
DEVA.BM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 29, 2008
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with DEVA.BM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Stadtallendorf, DE
Stadtallendorf, DE
Stadtallendorf, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JONATHAN MYERS
JONATHAN MYERS THE FIRM OF KARL F. ROSS PC5683 RIVERDALE AVENUE, BOX 9001493 Chain Bridge Road, Suite 300BRONX, VA 10471-0900Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | [METALS IN THE FORM OF SEMI-FINISHED PRODUCTS FOR USE IN THE FURTHER MANUFACTURE OF SEALS AND PACKINGS; SHAPED SINTERED METAL PARTS AS SEMI-FINISHED PRODUCTS FOR USE IN THE FURTHER MANUFACTURE OF SEALS, PACKING, BUSHES AND SHAFTS; MOLDS OF METAL FOR CASTING CERAMIC MATERIALS; SHAPED SINTERED METAL PARTS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF SEALS AND PACKINGS; METAL IN POWDER FORM WITH SOLID LUBRICANT PROPERTIES FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF SEALS, PACKINGS, BUSHES AND SHAFTS] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 31, 2004 |
| 007 | MACHINE PARTS, NAMELY, PISTON RINGS AND SEALING RINGS; MACHINE PARTS OF SHAPED POWDER METALLURGICAL AND SINTERED METAL PARTS, NAMELY, PLAIN BEARINGS, SLIDING ELEMENTS, SLIDING PLATES, BUSHES AND SPINDLE NUTS | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2004 |
| 017 | [NON-METALLIC MINERAL FIBERS IN THE FORM OF SEMI-FINISHED PRODUCTS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF SEALS AND PACKINGS] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 31, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FEDERAL-MOGUL DEVA GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by FEDERAL-MOGUL DEVA GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by FEDERAL-MOGUL DEVA GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named DEVA.BM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2019 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 10, 2019 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 10, 2019 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 2019 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| May 8, 2019 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| May 7, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jul 30, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 23, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2008 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 26, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 29, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 2, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |