CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for AMIGOWARE

USPTO serial 78562144

AMIGOWARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, YONG OH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMIGOWARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marsha G. Ajhar

RICHARD H KOBY ESQ HARTMAN & CRAVEN LLP488 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Step stools, mirrors, pillows, picture frames, plaster figurines, wood figurines; furniture, namely, chairs, tables, desks; non-metal key chains and key chain tags; pet cushions; tissue box covers of wood, plastic and polyresin and decorative boxes of wood, plastic and polyresinACTIVE—
021Toothbrushes, toothbrush holders, lotion dispensers, soap dispensers, soap dishes, bath sponges made of natural fibers, such as cotton, and foam; plates, bowls, cups, mugs; paper plates, bowls and cups; trash cans; porcelain figurines; sports bottles sold emptyACTIVE—
024Shower curtains, towels, wash cloths, washing mitts, bed sheets, pillowcases, bed blankets, comforters, duvet covers, curtains, draperies and fabric valancesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 12, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 10, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 24, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 29, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 9, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 9, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 10, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 10, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 13, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 27, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 16, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance