USPTO serial 78562303
ITELEDRUGS.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YAO, GRETTA
- Law office
- PHOTOCOMP COORDINATOR
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ITELEDRUGS.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sean D. Johnson, Esq.
XPX - NOT PROVIDED SEAN D JOHNSON, ES; QUARLES & BRADY STONE RENAISSANCE SQU; TWO N CENTRAL APHOENIX AZ, AZ 85004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising services, namely promoting the services of health care professionals, health care organizations and pharmaceutical companies through the distribution of audio, video, print and online promotional materials; On-line ordering services featuring prescription drugs and refills thereof. | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | Providing web conferencing services to coordinate and conduct video appointments and consultations via email and telephone for remote consultation and communication among or between patients, health care professionals, insurance companies, hospitals, nursing homes, medical clinics, health care organizations and pharmaceutical companies; webcasting services featuring medical, mental health, medicine, pharmaceutical and health care news and topics of interests related thereto. | ABANDONED | — |
| 044 | Remote monitoring of data indicative of the health or condition of an individual or group of individuals in the nature of medical, health care and pharmaceutical codes, records, tests, procedures, techniques and results; facilitating and assisting with the process of prescribing medications online, namely, interactive medical monitoring and alert services for reminding clients of medical information, namely, medicinal dosage, allergic sensitivity, and prescription refills; providing medical, mental health, medicine, pharmaceutical and health care news and information via the Internet. | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2006 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |