CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for NUTRAORGANICS

USPTO serial 78562304

NUTRAORGANICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YAO, GRETTA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NUTRAORGANICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael L. Leetzow

MICHAEL L LEETZOW MICHAEL L LEETZOW PA5213 SHORELINE CIRSANFORD, FL 32771UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Nutritional supplements and dietary supplements for human consumptionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2011UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jan 6, 2011UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Dec 20, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 3, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 21, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 21, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 21, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 21, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 20, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 19, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 18, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 18, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 18, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 21, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 20, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 14, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 9, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 9, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 9, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 22, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 20, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 9, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 9, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 15, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 15, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 15, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 22, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 20, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 20, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 8, 2008TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Apr 8, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 8, 2008OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Mar 18, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 25, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 4, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 20, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 14, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 3, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 16, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance