Drawing for POKERPRO THE BEST BET IN POKER!

USPTO serial 78562486

POKERPRO THE BEST BET IN POKER!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEIMER, CAROLINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POKERPRO THE BEST BET IN POKER!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John P. Seurynck

JOHN P SEURYNCK HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PC39400 WOODWARD AVE STE 101BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-5151UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software for use in automating casino games, casino information, casino management, player tracking, and progresive and bonus linking of electronic gaming machines; animatronic displaysACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 12, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 11, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 17, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 28, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 30, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 18, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 15, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 15, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 15, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 15, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 10, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2005GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 9, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 6, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 16, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance