Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78562591?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78562591. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns DAVIS CREEK MEATS & SEAFOOD?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78562591, the listed owner(s) include: Gordon Food Service, Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 78562591?

Serial number 78562591 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark DAVIS CREEK MEATS & SEAFOOD. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of DAVIS CREEK MEATS & SEAFOOD?

DAVIS CREEK MEATS & SEAFOOD (78562591) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover DAVIS CREEK MEATS & SEAFOOD?

The public record lists International Classes: 029. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

Trademark: DAVIS CREEK MEATS & SEAFOOD Serial# 78562591 | status 603; last event MAB3 | Trademark Info & Attorney Guidance

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DAVIS CREEK MEATS & SEAFOOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Gordon Food Service, Inc.
Grand Rapids, MI
Other trademarks owned by Gordon Food Service, Inc.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John A. Waters

JOHN A WATERS VARNUM, RIDDERING, SCHMIDT & HOWLETT LLPPO BOX 352GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
029	MEAT AND SEAFOOD	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Jun 6, 2007	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Jun 6, 2007	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Jun 6, 2007	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
May 13, 2007	EXFB	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF	—
Jan 12, 2007	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Jan 12, 2007	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Jul 12, 2006	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 12, 2006	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 12, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jun 26, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jun 21, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 21, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2006	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Jun 21, 2006	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Apr 21, 2006	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 20, 2006	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 8, 2005	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2005	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Feb 16, 2005	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—

DAVIS CREEK MEATS & SEAFOOD