Drawing for EQUAZEN

USPTO serial 78562622

EQUAZEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EQUAZEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William H. Brewster

William H. Brewster Kilpatrick Stockton LLP1100 Peachtree Street, Suite 2800Atlanta, GA 30309-4530UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, high blood pressure, diabetes, atopic eczema, inflammation, cancer, multiple sclerosis and premenstrual syndrome, and for maintaining healthy hair and skin, maintaining the circulatory system, maintaining the mind and nervous system including retinal and brain cell function, maintaining hormonal balance, maintaining normal gastrointestinal function, managing the musculoskeletal system and maintaining a healthy reproductive system; dietetic foods adapted for medical use; infants' and invalids' foods, namely, nutritional supplements in the form of drinks and chewy foods; vitamin preparations; non-medicated food supplements; dietary and nutritional supplements; dietary and nutritional supplements for animals; and additives to fodder for medical purposesACTIVE—
029Edible oils and fats; fish oil; evening primrose oil; thyme oil; and processed edible seedsACTIVE—
031Living plants; foodstuffs for animals; and unprocessed edible seedsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 14, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 13, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 13, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 13, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 3, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 8, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 13, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 13, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 26, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 27, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 27, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 27, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 21, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 21, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 21, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 15, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 15, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 15, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 15, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 23, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 3, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 30, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 20, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 20, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 13, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 7, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 16, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance