USPTO serial 78562969
REAL T REAL-TREASURES REAL ESTATE BROKERAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REAL T REAL-TREASURES REAL ESTATE BROKERAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hackensack, NJ
Hackensack, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATHLEEN COONEY-PORTER
KATHLEEN COONEY-PORTER OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3451UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pizza, Joseph
- Other trademarks owned by Pizza, Joseph
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named REAL T REAL-TREASURES REAL ESTATE BROKERAGE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 7, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 4, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 31, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |