USPTO serial 78562992
BEAUTY TRUTH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEAUTY TRUTH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy B. Goldsmith
AMY B GOLDSMITH GOTTLIEB, RACKMAN & REISMAN PC270 MADISON AVE FL 8NEW YORK, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERFUMES, EAU DE COLOGNE, EAU DE TOILETTE; COSMETICS, NAMELY MOISTURIZING FACIAL SKIN CREAM, FACIAL CLEANSING CREAM, LOOSE FACE POWDER, PRESSED FACE POWDER, FOUNDATION MAKE-UP, LIPSTICKS, EYE SHADOW, BLUSHER, MASCARA, EYELINER, EYE PENCILS, LIP PENCILS; HAIR CARE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY SHAMPOOS, HAIR CONDITIONER, HAIR RINSES, HAIR SPRAY AND STYLING GEL; BODY LOTIONS; NAIL ENAMEL, NAIL ENAMEL REMOVER; SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY BODY CREAM, HAND CREAM, SKIN LOTION, BODY LOTION, FACIAL LOTION, FACIAL SCRUBS, MOISTURIZERS, SOAP, SHOWER GEL, BATH GEL, BATH OIL, AFTER-SHAVE LOTION, SHAVING CREAM AND BABY POWDER; SUNTAN LOTION; TOOTHPASTE; MOUTHWASH | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |