USPTO serial 78563098
REZILLION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REZILLION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
St. Laurent, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marsha G. Gentner
JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2218UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | durable, flame retardant, hydrostatic resistant, stain resistant, anti-bacterial, anti-fungal, anti-microbial coating for application to finished fabrics and other textiles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 28, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 28, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |