Drawing for BEAR FRUIT BAR

USPTO serial 78563148

BEAR FRUIT BAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEAR FRUIT BAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas W. Lathram

THOMAS W LATHRAM SILICON EDGE LAW GROUP6601 KOLL CTR PKWY STE 245PLEASANTON, CA 94566UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029organic fruit bars made from organic fruits and organic vegetable bars made from organic vegetablesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 4, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 19, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 19, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 5, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 2, 2008GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2008GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 12, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 13, 2007GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 25, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2007ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 15, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 15, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 20, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 20, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 29, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 5, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 17, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 22, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 19, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 19, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 19, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 28, 2006FAXXFAX SENT—
Mar 28, 2006FAXXFAX SENT—
Sep 6, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance