USPTO serial 78563502
ZELENS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 1, 2007
- Examiner
- HIRSCHMAN, PAMELA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with ZELENS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Owner
Zelens Dermatological Research Limited
Wickhams Cay I, Road Town, Tortola, GB
Other trademarks owned by Zelens Dermatological Research Limited
LONDON, VG
Zelens Dermatological Research Limited
Wickhams Cay I, Road Town, Tortola, GB
Other trademarks owned by Zelens Dermatological Research Limited
London, GB
Zelens Dermatological Research Limited
Wickhams Cay I, Road Town, Tortola, GB
Other trademarks owned by Zelens Dermatological Research Limited
London, GB
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SKINCARE PREPARATIONS AND SUBSTANCES, NAMELY, BODY LOTIONS; NOURISHING CREAMS FOR THE SKIN; BATH OILS; SKIN MOISTURIZER; SUN CREAM AND OTHER SUN PROTECTION PREPARATIONS; AFTER SUN CREAMS AND LOTIONS; SKIN CREAM;NON-MEDICATED LIP BALM; ANTI-OXIDANT HAND SOAP INCLUDING MEDICATED SOAP; PREPARATIONS FOR THE CARE OF THE SKIN, SCALP AND THE BODY, NAMELY, ANTI-OXIDANT CREAMS, MILKS, LOTIONS, GELS AND POWDERS; PREPARATIONS FOR TONING THE BODY, NAMELY, SKIN TONERS; PERFUME, EAU DE COLOGNE, TOILET WATER; TALCUM POWDER; GELS, FOAM AND SALTS FOR THE BATH AND THE SHOWER; TOILET SOAPS; BODY DEODORANTS; CREAMS, MILKS, LOTIONS, GELS AND POWDERS FOR THE FACE, THE BODY AND THE HANDS; SUN CARE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, SUN CARE LOTIONS, CREAMS AND GELS; MAKE-UP PREPARATIONS, NAMELY FOUNDATIONS, CREAMS AND LOTIONS FOR THE SKIN, SKIN CLEANSING CREAMS, LOTIONS, MILKS AND GELS, EYE SHADOW, SKIN WHITENING OR COLORING CREAMS, LOTIONS, MILKS AND GELS; AFTERSHAVES; SHAVING FOAMS AND CREAMS;PREPARATIONS FOR THE HAIR, NAMELY, SHAMPOO; HAIR LACQUERS; HAIR COLORING AND HAIR DECOLORANT PREPARATIONS; PERMANENT WAVING AND CURLING PREPARATIONS; ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE; DENTIFRICES; ANTI-PERSPIRANTS; DEODORANTS FOR PERSONAL USE | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | HAIRDRESSING SERVICES; PROVISION OF DAY SPA FACILITIES; BEAUTY SALON SERVICES; HYDROTHERAPY AND MASSAGE SERVICES; BODY AND FACIAL BEAUTY TREATMENT SERVICES; MANICURING AND NAILCARE SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Zelens Dermatological Research Limited
- Other trademarks owned by ZELENS LABORATORIES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Zelens Dermatological Research Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Lens, Marko, MR.
- Other trademarks owned by Zelens Dermatological Research Limited
- Other trademarks owned by LENS, Marko
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named ZELENS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 18, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 18, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 21, 2013 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 7, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2013 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| May 6, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 1, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2005 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 12, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |