USPTO serial 78563508
KANEKA Q10
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KANEKA Q10?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary D. Krugman
Gary D. Krugman SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; toiletries, namely, soap, essential oils, hair shampoo, conditioner, hair rinse, bath oil, bath gel, body powder, body lotion, body cream, body moisturizers, personal deodorants and antiperspirants; hygienic gum for oral use, namely, dentifrices | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Functional foods, namely, dairy-based food beverages, soy-based food beverages used as a milk substitute, and vegetable-based food beverages; fruit-based and soy-based snack bars; processed foods, namely, pre-packed dinners and prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, seafood, poultry and game, canned fruits, canned vegetables, cooked canned meats, butter, cheese, margarine, cream, oils for food, soup, frozen, prepared, packaged curried entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; milk products, namely dry whole milk powder, dry low fat milk powder, dry non-fat milk powder, dry butter milk powder, whey powder, lactic acid drinks, products of processed oil and fat, namely, olive oil, corn oil, sesame oil, soybean oil, cacao oil, blended oil, rape oil, palm oil and edible fat, sunflower oil, and peanut oil, beef tallow, bone oil, lard, poultry fat, fish oil, hydrogenated oil, shortening, powdered oils, seasoning oils, processed ubiquinone for food purposes; processed ubiquinol for food purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Confectionary, namely, biscuits, chocolate, caramel, snacks, namely, puffed corn snacks, cereal based snack foods, rice-based snack foods, cake, ice cream, hotcake mix, candy, chewing gum, cookies, pies, rusks, waffles, fruit jellies; licorice extract for use as flavoring in foods and beverages; processed licorice used as a flavoring additive for non-nutritional food purposes; processed foods, namely ready-to-eat cereals, noodle, bread, oatmeal, custard cream fillings | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Sports drinks; energy drinks; fruit juices and fruit drinks, vegetable juices and vegetable drinks; syrups, powders, concentrates and effervescent tablets for making drinks and beverages, namely, soft drinks and fruit drinks; mineral waters, aerated waters, carbonated bottled and drinking waters, flavored waters, and other non-alcoholic beverages, namely, punches, soft drinks, smoothies and lemonades; tea drinks, namely, soft drinks flavored with tea; soy-based beverages not being milk substitutes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KANEKA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by KANEKA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named KANEKA Q10
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 11, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 21, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 15, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 2, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |