Drawing for SCRUBEX

USPTO serial 78563522

SCRUBEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, DEBRA ANN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCRUBEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy B. Goldsmith

AMY B GOLDSMITH GOTTLIEB RACKMAN & REISMAN PC270 MADISON AVE 8TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Abrasive coatings for sponges and scouring padsACTIVEOct 27, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Sep 14, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 13, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2006CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 8, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 8, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 31, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 8, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 19, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 20, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 16, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 12, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 12, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance