Drawing for CONFORMAL IMPACT GEAR

USPTO serial 78563526

CONFORMAL IMPACT GEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, DEBRA ANN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONFORMAL IMPACT GEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James G. Porcelli, Registration No. 33,757

JAMES G PORCELLI REGISTRATION NO 33 WEBB ZIESENHEIM LOGSDON ORKIN & HANSON700 KOPPERS BLDG 436 7TH AVEPITTSBURGH, PA 15219-1818UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Seat pads and seat cushions for land vehiclesACTIVE—
022Kits consisting primarily of polymer padding material for use in fabricating athletic protective pads for use by athletesACTIVE—
025Protective clothing for use by athletes in contact and non-contact sports, namely, padded shirts, padded pants, padded shorts, padded socks, and padded leggingsACTIVE—
028Athletic pads, namely, helmet pads, neck pads, shoulder pads, arm pads, elbow pads, wrist pads, hand pads, glove pads, body pads, buttock pads, crotch cup pads, leg pads, knee pads, shin and ankle pads, for use in contact and non-contact sports; Gloves and other athletic equipment worn by athletes containing such pads, namely, batting gloves, baseball gloves, football gloves, hockey gloves, golf gloves, baseball chest protector, and hockey chest protectorACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 5, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 12, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 23, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 26, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
May 1, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 17, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 22, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 12, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance