USPTO serial 78563548
L.E.D.A LUBBOCK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3428124Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 13, 2008
- Examiner
- BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with L.E.D.A LUBBOCK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lubbock Econimic Development Alliance
Lubbock, TX
Other trademarks owned by Lubbock Econimic Development Alliance
Lubbock Econimic Development Alliance
Lubbock, TX
Other trademarks owned by Lubbock Econimic Development Alliance
Lubbock Econimic Development Alliance
Lubbock, TX
Other trademarks owned by Lubbock Econimic Development Alliance
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stacey S. Barber
STACEY S BARBER CRENSHAW, DUPREE & MILAM LLP8TH FLWELLS FARGO CTR 1500 BROADWAYLUBBOCK, TX 79408Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting the economic development in the City of Lubbock, Texas | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lubbock Econimic Development Alliance
- Other trademarks owned by Lubbock Econimic Development Alliance
- Other trademarks owned by Lubbock Econimic Development Alliance
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named L.E.D.A LUBBOCK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 13, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 7, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 5, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2007 | GSPS | NOTIFICATION OF SU - PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | GSPR | SU - PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | SPRA | SU - PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 29, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 9, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 5, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 24, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2006 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |