USPTO serial 78564291
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
HARSCO TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
FAIRMONT, MN
HARSCO TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
FAIRMONT, MN
HARSCO TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
FAIRMONT, MN
FAIRMONT, MN
Surrey, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rebecca A. Finkenbinder
Rebecca A. Finkenbinder McNees Wallace Nurick LLC100 Pine StreetHarrisburg, PA 17108UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Employment agency services; distribution of prospectuses; compilation of business data; business management assistance | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Renovation, repair and maintenance of metallurgical vessels, industrial boilers and of nuclear plant; reconditioning of metallurgical equipment, namely renovation, repair and maintenance services; servicing of metallurgical vessels, namely maintenance and relining of tun dishes, ladles and slag pots, industrial boilers and of nuclear plant; cleaning of metallurgical equipment,industrial boilers and of nuclear plant; cleaning of buildings, roads, gantries, walkways and of runways, installation of metallurgical equipment; construction and maintenance of educational and industrial buildings; painting and sealing of buildings; vermin eradication other than agriculture, forestry or horticulture; laying of pipes, laboratory repair services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 039 | Warehousing; packing and transporting of goods and raw materials; loading and unloading of ore, coal, coke, scrap and of slag | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Treatment of waste material; reclamation of solids from aqueous media by chemical precipitation; purification of industrial waste water; heat treatment of metals and alloys; reprocessing of nuclear fuels; purification of minerals by chemical and magnetic methods; water treatment, namely extraction of minerals from water by chemical and magnetic methods; electroplating; surface finishing and grinding of articles of common metal; chemical treatment of boilers and pipework thereof; chemical treatment and decontamination of nuclear plant and parts thereof; steel cutting; rental of cutting equipment, scarfing equipment and water treatment equipment; treatment of slag arising from metal casting; welding services for repair and maintenance | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computer programming for others; design and planning of installations for use in casting of molten metal; laboratory research services in the field of waste treatment and mineral extraction; analysis and testing of materials; chemical and mechanical engineering consultancy services; geological prospecting | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 6, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 1, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |