Drawing for KATATUDE

USPTO serial 78564421

KATATUDE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAHMOUDI, MARIAM AZIZ
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KATATUDE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donna Mirman Broome

DONNA MIRMAN BROOME GOTTLIEB, RACKMAN & REISMAN PC270 MADISON AVE FL 8NEW YORK, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018ATHLETIC BAGS, ALL PURPOSE SPORT BAGS, GYM BAGS, WALLETS, PURSES, POCKET BOOKS, BACKPACKS, AND UMBRELLASACTIVE—
025Women's urban apparel and athletic wear, namely, t-shirts, jogging suits, sweat suits, boxing shorts, sport bras, tops,sweat tops, tank sets, kimonos, cat suits, jump suits, jersey, belts, scarves, panties, arm warmers, head bands, wristbands, leg warmers, coats, jackets, loungewear, pajamas, robes, slippers ,hosiery and footwearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 9, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 9, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 20, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 16, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 16, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 15, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 15, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 30, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance