Drawing for TWENTY ONE 21

USPTO serial 78564779

TWENTY ONE 21

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TWENTY ONE 21?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce B. Brunda

BRUCE B BRUNDA STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 ENTERPRISE STE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656-2681UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Eyewear, namely, sunglassesACTIVE—
014Jewelry, namely, bracelets, earrings, necklaces, pins, brooch, rings and watchesACTIVE—
018Accessories, namely handbags, purses, coin purses, wallets, lipstick cases, pocket books and umbrellasACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, shoes, pants, shirts, jackets, skirts, dresses, gowns, scarfs, belts, robes, pajamas, vests and hats; tube tops, tank tops, corsets, bras, underwear and shawlsACTIVE—
035Retail store services featuring eyewear, namely, sunglasses; jewelry, namely, bracelets, earrings, necklaces, rings and watches, accessories, shoes, handbags, and clothing, namely, pants, shirts, jackets, skirts, dresses, gowns, scarfs, belts, robes, pajamas, vests and hats, tube tops, tank tops, corsets, bras, underwear and shawlsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 9, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 8, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 8, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 8, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 7, 2007EAREEARLY EXTENSION OF USE REFUSED—
Dec 7, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2007ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Oct 30, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 19, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 4, 2007CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2007OTHECASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION—
Jun 7, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2007IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Dec 5, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 19, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 19, 2006OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Oct 12, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 12, 2006TTBNCASE ASSIGNED TO TTAB—
Oct 12, 2006IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Aug 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 3, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Oct 27, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 21, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 17, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 13, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 11, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 11, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 10, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 18, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance