USPTO serial 78565096
VALUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 12, 2006
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with VALUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shelton, WA
Shelton, WA
Shelton, WA
Shelton, WA
Shelton, WA
Shelton, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George C. Rondeau, Jr.
Brown, Bea DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE, LLP920 Fifth AvenueSuite 3300Seattle, WA 98104-1610Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Math manipulative game consisting of playing cards displaying number matrices and mathematical equations, and chips for marking numbers on playing cards; sets of playing cards displaying mathematical equations for use in playing a math manipulative game; sets of playing cards displaying number matrices for use in playing a math manipulative game; and chips to be used with playing cards for use in playing a math manipulative game | ACTIVE | Dec 15, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Brown, Beatrice T.
- Other trademarks owned by Brown, Beatrice T.
- Other trademarks owned by Brown, Beatrice T.
- Other trademarks owned by Brown, John C.
- Other trademarks owned by Brown, John C.
- Other trademarks owned by Brown, John C.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named VALUE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 2, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 27, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 31, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 1, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |