Drawing for VISIA

USPTO serial 78565368

VISIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HELFMAN, JUDITH MICHELLE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VISIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Information technology services, namely, designing and implementing web sites for others; hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global network; designing graphical user interface software for others; designing software for application database integration for use with Internet and intranet access; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for application and database integrationACTIVEAug 15, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 13, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 24, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 24, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 7, 2007GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 26, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 22, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 22, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 22, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 24, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 24, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 21, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance