USPTO serial 78566746
HUMAN RESOURCES MEETINGS-IN-A-BOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HUMAN RESOURCES MEETINGS-IN-A-BOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Caroline G. Chicoine, Charles H. Fendell, Richard E. Haferkamp, John M. Howell, Kevin M. Kercher, Paul A. Maddock, Alan H. Norman, Thomas A. Polcyn, Joseph M. Rolnicki, Mark Sableman, Richard H. Shear, Kenneth Solomon, David B. Jinkins, Matthew A. Braunel
CAROLINE G CHICOINE CHARLES H FENDELL THOMPSON COBURN LLPONE US BANK PLZSAINT LOUIS, MO 63101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Kits consisting of printed instructional materials in the forms of books, manuals, and pamphlets, prerecorded CD-roms and disks, and prerecorded videotape recordings in the field of corporate internal employee education, on the subject of human resources | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Douglas Publications LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Douglas Publications LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named HUMAN RESOURCES MEETINGS-IN-A-BOX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 3, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |