Drawing for BUILT IN THE USA

USPTO serial 78568115

BUILT IN THE USA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BUILT IN THE USA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018DUFFEL BAGS, COIN PURSES, BACKPACK, BELT BAGS, BRIEFCASES, CARRYING CASES, CARRY ALL BAGS, CARRY ON BAGS, EVENING HANDBAGS, ALL PURPOSE SPORTS BAGS, ALL PURPOSE ATHLETIC BAGS, ALL PURPOSE CARRYING BAGSACTIVEJun 22, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 15, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 26, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 10, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 30, 2006GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 10, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 10, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 10, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 10, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 8, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 8, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 4, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance