USPTO serial 78568319
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard S. Roberts
RICHARD S ROBERTS ROBERTS & ROBERTS, LLP ATTORNEYS ATPO BOX 484PRINCETON, NJ 08542-0484UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | USB computer port hubs, USB computer port powered mouse pads, external computer disk drives, computer scanners, cameras, electronic data organizers, electronic personal digital assistants, scales, computer mice, magnetic coded card readers, computer connected electronic writing boards, computer keypads, calculators, loudspeakers, computer keyboards; radios, and vacuum cleaners, all for electrical connection to a computer or a motor vehicle | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Electric fans, electric cup warmers, air ionizers, and lamps, all for electrical connection to a computer or a motor vehicle | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 22, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 28, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |