USPTO serial 78568802
PIT BULL US SPORTS BAR 'N GRILL THE MIGHTY MIGHTY PIT BULLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PIT BULL US SPORTS BAR 'N GRILL THE MIGHTY MIGHTY PIT BULLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LOS ANGELES, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CARL GORDON OF GORDON DESIGNS
CARL GORDON OF GORDON DESIGNS GORDON DESIGNS1125 S HOLT AVE STE 3LOS ANGELES, CA 90035UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant and bar services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gordon, Mae
- Other trademarks owned by Gordon, Mae
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named PIT BULL US SPORTS BAR 'N GRILL THE MIGHTY MIGHTY PIT BULLS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 16, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 10, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 23, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 10, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |