USPTO serial 78569070
THE SHOE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TIERNEY, MARGERY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE SHOE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryce K. Earl, Esq., Jennifer K. Craft, Esq., Brett D. Ekins, Esq., James D. Boyle, Esq. and Ben West, Esq.
BRYCE K EARL ESQ JENNIFER K CRAFT SANTORO, DRIGGS, WALCH, KEARNEY, JOHNSON3RD FL400 S 4TH STLAS VEGAS, NV 89101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Casino and gaming services; providing gaming facilities; conducting and providing facilities for special events featuring casino and gaming contests and tournaments; entertainment services in the nature of providing facilities to view television, cable television and pay-per-view television entertainment programs or episodes featuring sporting events, commentators and betting experts discussing sporting events; nightclub services; providing facilities for non-gaming arcade games; entertainment services in the nature of arranging, conducting and providing facilities for special events featuring contests, tournaments, exhibitions, seminars and conferences; entertainment services in the nature of musical, dramatic, magic, dance, acrobatic and comedic performances; providing reservations, bookings, advice and counseling services to others in the fields of casinos, shows and other entertainment; and providing general and local news and information in the areas of sports, business, technology, entertainment, gaming, arts, dining, leisure, travel and games on and through a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |