USPTO serial 78569328
LOTUSATHLETIC CLEAR MIND PURE HEART STRONG SPIRIT EXCLUSIVELY AT LE CHÂTEAU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3198092Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 16, 2007
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LOTUSATHLETIC CLEAR MIND PURE HEART STRONG SPIRIT EXCLUSIVELY AT LE CHÂTEAU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec H4P 2P5, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer L. Dean
Jennifer L. Dean DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP1500 K Street, NWSuite 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | [ HANDBAGS, PURSES; WALLETS, BILLFOLDS, UMBRELLAS, SPORTS BAGS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | [ MEN'S, ] WOMEN'S [ AND CHILDREN'S ] WEARING APPAREL, NAMELY-- SHIRTS, SWEATERS, [ SUITS, ] SPORTS JACKETS, [ TOPCOATS, DRESSES, ] PANTS, COATS, [ JUMPSUITS, VESTS, ] T-SHIRTS, [ BLAZERS, RAINCOATS, PONCHOS, CAFTANS, SWEATSHIRTS, ] SWEAT PANTS [, JERSEYS, TUNICS, BLOUSES, SKIRTS; SWIMWEAR, NAMELY-- SWIMSUITS, ROBES; ] UNDERWEAR AND LINGERIE, NAMELY--[ UNDERWEAR TOPS AND BOTTOMS, ] SHORTS [, PAJAMAS, ROBES, STOCKINGS, HOSIERY, PANTYHOSE, PANTIES, BRASSIERES; FASHION ACCESSORIES, NAMELY-- SCARVES, HATS, BELTS, GLOVES, KERCHIEFS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 028 | [ SPORTING AND EXERCISE ARTICLES AND ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, ANKLE AND WRIST WEIGHTS FOR EXERCISE, MOUTH GUARDS FOR ATHLETIC USE, ATHLETIC PROTECTIVE PADS FOR KNEES, ELBOWS, SHOULDERS AND WRISTS, ATHLETIC TAPE, BARBELLS, DUMBBELL SETS, DUMBBELLS, EXERCISE WEIGHT CUFFS, EXERCISE WEIGHTS, EXERCISING PULLEYS, SKIPPING ROPE ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Le Château Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Le Château Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Le Château Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named LOTUSATHLETIC CLEAR MIND PURE HEART STRONG SPIRIT EXCLUSIVELY AT LE CHÂTEAU
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 16, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 11, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |