USPTO serial 78569489
EVIDENCE-DRIVEN ADVOCACY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3110726Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 27, 2006
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EVIDENCE-DRIVEN ADVOCACY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
INDIANAPOLIS, IN
INDIANAPOLIS, IN
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amie Peele Carter
AMIE PEELE CARTER BAKER & DANIELS LLP300 N MERIDIAN STINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing business marketing information on products in the fields of health care and medical technology; preparing promotional materials for others; business consulting services, namely, business and pricing strategy development for others, product positioning and market research in the fields of health care and medical technology; preparing business reports for others in the fields of health care and medical technology for submission to investors and capital venture companies for the purpose of obtaining investments; lobbying, namely, promoting legislative and regulatory interests of businesses in the field of health care and medical technology; grass root advocacy, namely, promoting the interests of businesses in the field of health care and medical technology; developing promotional campaigns for businesses in the field of health care and medical technology; business services, namely, non-legal representation of others before the United States Food and Drug Administration and centers for Medicare and Medicaid; business services, namely, representing others in trade associations in the fields of health care and medical technology; business consultation relating to complaint resolution, product failure investigations and crisis management in the fields of health care and medical technology; facilitating technology transfer for others, namely, providing business advice in the field of technology transfer; conducting due diligence and compliance audits for others, namely, conducting due diligence and compliance audits relating to business oversight and business mergers in the fields of health care and medical technology | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 17, 2006 |
| 042 | Consultation relating to compliance with health care and medical technology regulations; product research and development in the field of health care and medical technology; development and assessment of quality control systems for others in the field of health and medical technology; development and assessment of clinical trials for others in the field of health care and medical technology; drafting legislation and regulations for others in the fields of health care and medical technology; tracking legislation and regulations for others in the fields of health care and medical technology | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 17, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by B&D GROUP, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by B&D GROUP, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by B&D Group, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by B&D Group, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by B&D Group, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by B&D Group, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EVIDENCE-DRIVEN ADVOCACY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 12, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |