Drawing for TECHNOLOGYLAWYERS.COM

USPTO serial 78569646

TECHNOLOGYLAWYERS.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3091735Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 9, 2006
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TECHNOLOGYLAWYERS.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alex Alexander

Alex Alexander Internet Brands, Inc.909 N. Sepulveda Blvd.11th FloorEl Segundo, CA 90245

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising and marketing for legal service providers and promoting the services of others by providing a website at which users can link to legal service providersSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDApr 16, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 27, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 22, 2012C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
May 19, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 27, 2012C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Apr 27, 2012ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
May 19, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 11, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 6, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 13, 2010COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Apr 9, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 8, 2010ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 9, 2006R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Mar 27, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 20, 2006CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Mar 20, 2006IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Mar 17, 2006AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 17, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2006EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2006UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 19, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2006UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance