USPTO serial 78570331
CLEARSPEED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3351961Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 11, 2007
- Examiner
- ROTH, JASON I
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CLEARSPEED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bristol, GB
Bristol, GB
Bristol, GB
WHITNEY, OXON, GB
Whitney, Oxon
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maria A. Scungio
Maria A. Scungio Edwards Wildman Palmer LLPP.O. Box 1470Church Street StationNew York, NY 10008-1470Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware, namely integrated circuit boards, processors; parallel processors for computer networking; computer software embedded within integrated circuit boards, processors, and parallel processors, and for use in operation of such hardware; and print and downloadable electronic user manuals sold therewith; none of the aforesaid relating to financial services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | [ Printed publications, namely, books and magazines in the field of computer processing and signal processing; none of the aforesaid relating to financial services ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Licensing of computer software, computer hardware, computer firmware, computer systems, integrated circuit boards, computing processors, parallel processors, computing devices, and computing processors designs; none of the aforesaid relating to financial services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | [ Prototyping of integrated circuit boards, processors, parallel processors for others; none of the aforesaid relating to financial services ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | [ Training services in the field of computer processing and signal processing; none of the aforesaid relating to financial services ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Designing, modeling, simulating, programming and testing of integrated circuit boards, processors, parallel processors, and related software for others; [ intellectual property advisory and consultancy services; computer consultation services, namely, advisory and consultancy services relating to computer software, computer hardware, computer firmware, computer systems, integrated circuit boards, computer processors, parallel processors, and computing devices, none of the aforementioned relating to financial services ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ClearSpeed Technology plc
- Other trademarks owned by ClearSpeed Technology plc
- Other trademarks owned by ClearSpeed Technology plc
- Other trademarks owned by CLEARSPEED TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by ClearSpeed Technology Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CLEARSPEED
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 11, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 25, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 21, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2013 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 21, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 2, 2007 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 16, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |